What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever been through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

The smaller ones are being replaced by larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.


Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts.  safe distance from cell tower  can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science.  https://k12.instructure.com/eportfolios/366779/Home/What_lengths_Away_From_a_5G_Mobile_System_Should_You_Be  include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves.  safe distance to live from cell phone tower  are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.